One real workflow.
A recurring task that today needs several tools, a request to technology, or a script someone maintains.
Exiled Markets / The business case
Your analysts get answers and applications without waiting on a build queue; your engineers stop rebuilding the same data plumbing, views and agent glue for every new workflow. The way to know what that is worth is to measure it on one of yours.
Value and measurement
Each benefit has a measure you can take on your own team. We do not quote a savings percentage: your baseline decides it.
| VALUE | HOW IT SHOWS UP | WHAT TO MEASURE |
|---|---|---|
| Analytical capacity | Questions answered in the application the same day instead of entering a build or request queue. | Requests answered in-app vs. queued; time from question to a usable answer. |
| Engineering time | No new feed handlers, data conversion, UI bindings or agent glue for each workflow. | Engineer hours to deliver and maintain one comparable workflow, before and after. |
| Time to a reviewed number | Sources, methods and assumptions attached to each result. | Time to substantiate a figure used in a decision; review findings per workflow. |
| Tool and script sprawl | One-off notebooks and AI-generated scripts replaced by governed, inspectable applications. | Count of unowned scripts and notebooks in use; who checks them. |
| Context switching | Data, news, analytics and Ask in the same application. | Tools touched per task; time spent re-assembling context after a move. |
A short evaluation
Pick one real workflow, agree the measures before you start, and compare against how your team does it today.
A recurring task that today needs several tools, a request to technology, or a script someone maintains.
Pick two or three from the table above and record how long and how many hands the task takes now.
Run the same task in Exiled Markets on your questions, then compare on the measures you agreed.
Dynamic applications / Where builder time goes
Much of the demand on desk technology is small: a view, a comparison, a scenario, needed today and rarely needed again. Each one still costs a ticket or a script someone has to check and maintain. Answering those questions in a governed application returns that time to the work only engineers and quants can do, and lets analysts spend their own AI tools on higher-value problems.
Explore dynamic applicationsEvaluate: the share of requests that are quick turns, and the builder and analyst time they consume.
The economic case, itemized
Lower total cost of ownership comes from work a desk stops rebuilding for each application. This is that work, and what stays with you.
| Recurring work | Exiled supplies | Stays with you |
|---|---|---|
| Provider adapters | Sources: 40+ providers behind one capability contract, each read with its provenance and failure behavior | Data licences and entitlements |
| Data conversion | Frame and GraphFrame: typed, named data and relationships, units carried through calculations | Which sources your desk trusts for which figures |
| Interface bindings | Tables, charts, metrics and controls bound to live data, delivered to desktop, tablet and phone | The views specific to your desk |
| Agent integration | A model-independent harness: tool selection, limits, retained results and inspection | Which actions agents may take, and model choice |
| Logging and provenance | Every read, calculation and model call recorded with where it came from | Retention and review policy |
| Deployment | A self-contained runtime, one instance per user, few third-party dependencies to review | Hosting, identity and security sign-off |
No savings percentage is claimed: compare this list with the work your team does today for each new application.
Exiled Markets / Built on Exiled.AI
Bring one workflow and the measures that matter to your team. We will run it with you and compare.
Evaluate Exiled on a real workflow Launch Exiled Markets ↗